|
What is FOSS anyway?
FOSS stands for Free Open Source Software. The term combines the terms Free Software and Open Source which represent two related approaches to the ways in which software should be developed and distributed. You will also see it called FLOSS where the L stands for libre to strengthen the idea of free as in freedom, or as Richard Stallman puts it: "free as in free speech". The links below are intended as an introduction to the topic for people who may be entirely new to it, or interested in learning more about it. They also provide some info on its relationship to contemporary arts practice. This list is neither definitive nor exhaustive and there are many other resources available online. INTRODUCTORY TEXTS _The Free Software Definition_ The "classic" introduction to Free Software: http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html _The Open Source Definition_ This is a succinct outline of Open Source software. There are aspects of the principles given here which many people disagree with (such as whetheror not to support/oppose commercial software), but it serves as a decent enough introduction. http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php _licenses_ At the heart of Open Source is the use of copyright (or copyleft) licenseswhich seek to ensure the "free" use of software in contrast toconventional "restricted" commercial licenses. http://www.fsf.org/licenses/license-list.html _The GNU Project_Richard Stallman One of the pioneering Open Source/Free Software projects, by one of thepioneers of Free Software philosophy. http://www.fsf.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html _Free Culture_Lawrence Lessig Relating to the broader issues of Open Source and intellectual propertyrights and why over-zealous commercial control of culture and innovationis generally bad for society as a whole. http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/ policy/2002/08/15/lessig.html _Open Source Intelligence_Felix Stalder and Jesse Hirsh Comparing some approaches which effectively put into practice ideassimilar to those which Lessig promotes, applying the Open Source model ata wider level. http://news.openflows.org/article.pl?sid=02/04/23/1518208 _A Politics of Intellectual Property: Environmentalism For the Net?_James Boyle Relates discussions over intellectual property from an Open Sourceperspective to bio-informatics and genetic science issues. Argues thatenviromentalism provides a suitable model for understanding the relevanceof supporting a free public domain and open source ethos. http://www.law.duke.edu/boylesite/intprop.htm _Creative Commons_ Set up by Lessig, Boyle and others, Creative Commons promotes the conceptof a collective "commons" for culture and knowledge, similar to the olderconcept of "common land" (an area of land set aside from private ownershipfor the collective good of the community). One of thefeatures of Creative Commons is that it provides the tools for individualcreators to define their own licenses, thereby facilitating an Open Sourceapproach to legal practice. http://creativecommons.org OPEN SOURCE + ARTISTIC PRACTICE _Free Software as Collaborative Text_Florian Cramer If you only want to read one text I'd recommend this, provides anintroductory definition of Open Source and Free Software, a bit of historybehind their development, and their relationship to artistic practice anda broader concept of "net cultures". http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/~cantsin/ homepage/writings/copyleft/free_software/ free_software_as_text/en//free_software_as_text.html _Art meet Net, Net meet Art_Matthew Fuller Not directly dealing with Open Source but espouses related principles. Agood text on exploring the relations between internet and gallery-based art. http://www.tate.org.uk/netart/mat1.htm _The Hi-Tech Gift Economy_Richard Barbrook Again not overtly "Open Source" in topic but closely related. Takes abalanced, but optimistic, view of the internet as a legacy of Situationismand anarcho-communism. http://www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue3_12/barbrook/ _Culture Without Commodities: From Dada to Open Source and Beyond_Felix Stalder Kicks off with Greil Marcus's "Lipstick Traces" and parallels some ofBarbrook's text but with a more specific relation to Open Source and otherrecent developments. http://residence.aec.at/kop/writers/html/w3texts.html _read_me 2.3_ & runme.org "read_me" is a festival of software art, this site contains a selection ofessays relating to the medium and the featured projects from this year'sfestival. Runme is a related online repository of software art. http://www.m-cult.org/read_me http://www.runme.org/ CRITIQUE _The Californian Ideology_Richard Barbrook and Andy Cameron The Open Source movement, like any large-scale ideologically informedmovement, is a broad one with many differing views, some of which conflictwith the views of others who also support it. One such aspect of that inrelation to Open Source are the synergies between many American OpenSource advocates, such as Eric Raymond, and "libertarian" free-marketideologies (Raymond is also part of the pro-gun lobby). This article byRichard Barbrook and Andy Cameron is a critique of that. The first url isfor a site with the article and various responses to it, the second to asingle page version that is easy to print. http://www.hrc.westminster.ac.uk/hrc/theory/ californianideo/index/t.4.html http://www.alamut.com/subj/ideologies/ pessimism/califIdeo_I.html ORGANISATIONS + INDIVIDUALS + WEBSITES The Free Software Foundation http://www.fsf.org/ OpenFlows http://www.openflows.org/ Detritus http://www.detritus.net/ Scottish Linux Users Group http://www.scotlug.org.uk/ Lowtech http://www.lowtech.org dynebolic http://dynebolic.org/ slashdot http://slashdot.org/ Freshmeat http://freshmeat.net/ Sourceforge http://www.sourceforge.net Richard Stallman http://www.stallman.org/ Eric Raymond http://www.catb.org/~esr/ Lawrence Lessig http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/lessig/ Felix Stalder http://felix.openflows.org/html/left.html |
| supported by: | |
|
|